Clinical and Non-Clinical Aspects of Distal Radioulnar Joint Instability
MME Wijffels*, 1, PRG Brink2, IB Schipper1
Identifiers and Pagination:Year: 2012
First Page: 204
Last Page: 210
Publisher ID: TOORTHJ-6-204
Article History:Received Date: 12/12/2011
Revision Received Date: 19/3/2012
Acceptance Date: 26/3/2012
Electronic publication date: 30/5/2012
Collection year: 2012
open-access license: This is an open access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited..
Untreated distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) injuries can give rise to long lasting complaints. Although common, diagnosis and treatment of DRUJ injuries remains a challenge. The articulating anatomy of the distal radius and ulna, among others, enables an extensive range of forearm pronosupination movements. Stabilization of this joint is provided by both intrinsic and extrinsic stabilizers and the joint capsule. These structures transmit the load and prevent the DRUJ from luxation during movement. Several clinical tests have been suggested to determine static or dynamic DRUJ stability, but their predictive value is unclear. Radiologic evaluation of DRUJ instability begins with conventional radiographs in anterioposterior and true lateral view. If not conclusive, CT-scan seems to be the best additional modality to evaluate the osseous structures. MRI has proven to be more sensitive and specific for TFCC tears, potentially causing DRUJ instability. DRUJ instability may remain asymptomatic. Symptomatic DRUJ injuries treatment can be conservative or operative. Operative treatment should consist of restoration of osseous and ligamenteous anatomy. If not successful, salvage procedures can be performed to regain stability.
Traumatic injuries to the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) may give rise to long lasting complaints of pain and restricted function in the wrist and hand. Solitary DRUJ injuries are common, although they more often accompany distal radius fractures. Diagnosis and treatment of DRUJ injuries remain challenging. A high index of suspicion, effective diagnostic procedures and knowledge of the anatomical stabilizing structures are prerequisites for adequate diagnosis and treatment. This paper provides an overview of anatomy, clinical presentation, radiologic evaluation and treatment options related to stability and instability of the DRUJ.
The distal radioulnar articulation is formed by the distal sides of the radius and the ulna, the sigmoid notch and ulnar seat, respectively (Fig. 1a).
Due to the parallel positioning of the surfaces, with a difference in articulating curvature, the DRUJ provides pro- and supination in an extensive range, but yields stabilization  (Fig. 1b).
The ulnar seat has a smaller radius (small circle) compared to the sigmoid notch (large circle).
The DRUJ obtains stabilization from the joint capsule, the triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) and the capsule surrounding structures. The capsule is a tripartite structure, continuous with the radioulnar ligaments of the TFCC and the floor of the extensor carpi ulnaris (ECU) tendon sheet. Although closely associated with surrounding structures, the capsule remains an autonomous structure. Inferiorly the capsule originates from the proximal border of the sigmoid notch and is continuous with the interosseous membrane (IM). On the volar side the capsule comprises thin areas, adapting to dorsal translation of the radius during supination. Volarly the capsule is continuous with the radioulnar ligaments of the TFCC. Reinforcing oblique fibres, among others, protect the radius from dorsal luxation. Dorsally, on the ulnar side, the capsule is in intimate contact with the ECU sheet and has reinforcing fibres at its insertion on the radial aspect of the ulna .
The musculus extensor carpi ulnaris (ECU) is located on the dorso-medial side of the forearm. The ECU tendon inserts at the base of the 5th metacarpal and transverses the ulnocarpal joint through a fibro-osseous tunnel (sixth dorsal compartment), attached to the ulnar head  (Fig. 2).
The main extracapsular stabilizers of the DRU joint with one of the three reinforced areas of the interosseous membrane.
The musculus pronator quadratus (MPQ) is situated on the volar side of the wrist, surrounded by a thin fascia. The distal insertion of the MPQ fascia is the prominent palmar crest on the radius and the articular border of the ulna where it assembles the joint capsule. On the ulnar side, the MPQ develops two heads. The superficial head inserts on the medial intermuscular septum on the ulna. The deep head of the MPQ is in direct contact with the IM . The IM originates on the radius and inserts on the ulna, approximately 6 centimetres distal from the radial head. It is continuous with the DRUJ capsule and contains three reinforced regions. These regions are mainly responsible for the stability in longitudinal and transverse directions. Beside serving as a forearm stabilizer, the IM serves as the origin for flexors and extensors of the wrist .
The TFCC consists of five parts; the articular disc, the superficial and deep (ligamentum Subcruentum) radioulnar fibers, and the two disc-carpal ligaments  (Fig. 3).
The disc is a strong fibrocartilage structure, stretched between ulna and radius proximally and lunate and triquetral bones distally. The base of the disc is attached to the distal edge of the sigmoid notch; the incisura ulnaris radii. The apex of the disc is inserted to the depressed area of the ulnar head; the basistyloid fovea. It is continuous with the ulnar collateral ligament. On the volar side the disc is continuous with the ulnocarpal ligament, inserting on the lunate, triquetral and capitate bones [7,8]. The dorsal and palmar radioulnar fibers originate from the medial border of the distal radius and insert on the ulna at two distinct sites; deep fibers at the ulnar fovea and superficial fibers at the ulnar styloid (Fig. 4).
The dorsal and palmar radioulnar fibers originate from the medial border of the distal radius and insert on the ulna at two distinct sites; deep fibers at the ulnar fovea and superficial fibers at the ulnar styloid.
The four primary components of the ‘forearm joint’: the radiocapitellar joint, the proximal radioulnar joint, the IM and the DRUJ allow 180° of pro- and supination of the forearm. With the radius rotating around the fixed ulna, in maximum pronation of 90°, the two forearm bones are essentially parallel and the interosseous space will be at maximum width. The rotational movement gives rise to a translational movement of the radius relative to the distal ulna. In supination the ulnar head is positioned relative palmar and in pronation relative dorsal, to the radius. These combined movements result in a complex anatomical area, called the “centrode of rotation”, rather than a single center of rotation on the ulnar fovea [9,10]. The biomechanics of DRUJ instability therefor primarily concern the dislocation of a rotating radius around a fixed ulna. Contrary to what is often thought, it is not the ulna that is dislocating.
Stability is defined as equality of forces, with their specific moments, working on a fixed fulcrum. When load is applied on the hand, the fixed fulcrum is the DRUJ (Fig. 5).
To resist gravity, stability of the elbow and DRUJ is needed. Focusing on the DRUJ, this stability is provided extrinsic, by extracapsular structures, and intrinsic by intracapsular structures.
Extrinsic stability is provided by (1) the ECU tendon with its semi rigid sixth dorsal compartment [3,11], (2) the musculus pronator quadratus  and (3) the interosseous membrane . Tensioning of the ECU tendon and MPQ in supination results in increased DRUJ stability [3,9,11,14]. The distal oblique fibers of the IM prevent the distal radius from luxation during rotation [5,13,15-19].
The primary intrinsic stabilizer of the DRUJ is the TFCC, predominantly the radioulnar ligaments of the TFCC. Additional stability is provided by the DRUJ capsule, which allows pronosupination without anterioposterior luxation. Early theories about the effect of the TFCC on DRUJ stability, suggested unique, non-collaborating roles for both deep and superficial radioulnar fibers [1,20]. Hagert stated that in pronation, the dorsal superficial fibers tighten, as do the deep palmar fibers. Conversely, in supination, the palmar superficial radioulnar fibers tighten, as do the deep dorsal fibers  (Fig. 6a, b).
When the radius rotates around the ulna in pronation, the dorsal superficial fibers tighten, as do the deep palmar fibers.
When the radius rotates around the ulna in supination, the palmar superficial radioulnar fibers tighten, as do the deep dorsal fibers.
A less important mechanism of DRUJ stabilization, is the shift of the principal axis of load bearing. In maximal pronation and supination, the dorsal and volar radioulnar capsule respectively prevent the ulna from luxation .
CLINICAL PRESENTATION OF RADIOULNAR INSTABILITY
Although the radius is rotating around the ulna, ulnar dislocation is described, by convention, relative to the radius . Suspicion of DRUJ instability should increase after a history of wrist trauma, and restricted or painful pro- and supination. In specific cases of solitary distal ulna luxation the empty sulcus or groove for the ECU tendon can be palpated, in maximal supination on the head of the ulna. This is due to the ECU and the TFCC which are displaced into the DRUJ . Acute DRUJ instability accompanying a distal radius fracture, will be difficult to diagnose due to the swelling and deformity around the wrist joint. In chronic DRUJ instability, volar translation of the ulnar head is most frequently due to radial malunion, rather than to instability .
In testing the DRUJ, a distinction should be made between static and dynamic instability. Static instability is defined as laxity of the DRUJ with a non-rotating distal radius, as compared to the unaffected side. Dynamic instability can only be tested during forearm rotation. Only a small number of physical tests for determining DRUJ instability have been described. (Table 1).
Different Methods for Testing DRUJ Instability. Each Test is Explained and their Specific Characteristics are Described
|Name||How to Perform||Positive if:||Tested Stabilizer||Sensitivity (%)||Specificity (%)|
|Stress test/ballottement||Elbowflexion 90°, fingers to the ceiling. Dorsopalmar movement of the ulna in respect to the radius in maximal pronation and supination||Painful or DRUJ laxity||Palmar and dorsal lig. subcruentum||66||68|
|Radius pull test||Elbowflexion 90°, wrist in neutral position, pulling the radius in longitudinal direction||Ulnar variance increases during pulling under fluoroscopy||Interosseous membrane||Up to 100% in cadaveric studies||Up to 100% in cadaveric studies|
|Clunk test||Compress ulna to the radius during passive pronosupination||A clunk is palpable for the patient||Interosseous membrane||Not available||Not available|
|ECU test||Elbowflexion 90°, hand in ulnar deviation, active pronosupination||Abnormal motion ECU tendon||ECU tendon||Not available||Not available|
|Press test||Patient pushes himself up from seated position with use of affected wrist||Focal ulnar sided wrist pain||TFCC||100%||Not available|
The stress test for static DRUJ instability (Fig. 7), also known as the “piano sign” or ballottement maneuver, is mostly used but its diagnostic value remains disputed [16, 23-25].
The stress-test is performed by provoking anterolateral movement of the radius, while stabilizing the ulna. By comparing the stability of both the injured with the non-injured wrist, DRUJ instability can be diagnosed.
The radius pull test, as described by Essex-Lopresti [26-28], can diagnose longitudinal forearm instability.
Dynamic DRUJ instability can be diagnosed using the clunk test or the extensor carpi ulnaris test [16,29]. Presence of TFCC-lesions can be tested using the press-test . The clinical value of the press-test is unclear, since not every TFCC tear is associated with DRUJ instability [31,32]. Furthermore the correlation between physical examination and radiologic outcome remains unclear .
Anterioposterior (AP) and true lateral radiographs of both wrists should be made to compare the injured with the uninjured side. Secure positioning is essential in this respect. Projection of the pisiform bone over the distal part of the scaphoid indicates a pure lateral view [34,35].
A direct radiographic sign that indicates DRUJ instability, is widening of the distal radioulnar space on the AP radiograph, relative to the unaffected side. On the true lateral view a radioulnar distance of 6mm or more, between the most dorsal cortices, indicates DRUJ instability. If this distance measures 4 to 5 mm then further investigation is needed . Indirect signs, that may indicate DRUJ instability, are an ulnar styloid base fracture, 15° or more dorsal tilting of the distal radius, avulsion of the ulnar fovea, radial shortening of more than 4 mm. and a radial inclination less than 0° [37,38].
Radiopaque liquids injected intra-articularly, with repeated or continuous radiographs, facilitate visualization of the articular ligamentous borders. Articulograms of the wrist will only provide indirect signs that may account for DRUJ instability . Nowadays, the articulogram is little used, due to the introduction of magnetic resonance imaging.
When conventional radiographs are inconclusive, computed tomography scan (CT scan) can be of additional value in diagnosing DRUJ instability . A diagnostic protocol should include imaging of both wrists in maximal pronation, neutral position and maximal supination. Several techniques to define (sub)luxation have been suggested. The subluxation ratio method has been proven to be most useful [41-45]. CT has its advantages in detecting DRUJ instability, but malunions may account for a false positive outcome.
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Compared to CT scan, magnetic resonance (MR) has greater sensitivity for soft tissue contrast but provides less osseous details. Several techniques have been suggested to define DRUJ instability using MR . High resolution MRI provides a potential tool for diagnosing ulnar styloid fractures and TFCC tears, however the role of MR in evaluating direct signs of DRUJ instability remains unclear [47,48].
Arthroscopy has become popular when diagnosing TFCC tears, that may account for DRUJ instability, and their subsequent treatment. Furthermore, arthroscopy is sensitive in the evaluation of the articulating surfaces of the distal radius and ulna as part of treatment strategy .
Only one classification can be found for DRUJ instability. Seo and colleagues suggested a classification based on the outcome of the stress test . Operative treatment is predominantly reserved for symptomatic laxity or spontaneous subluxation of the DRUJ.
Before considering operative treatment of DRUJ instability, patients’ symptoms must be evaluated thoroughly. Painless DRUJ instability occurs in about one third of the patients after a distal radius fracture . In asymptomatic DRUJ instability, a “wait and see” policy can be advocated [24,31]. If symptomatic DRUJ dislocation is diagnosed, conservative treatment will only be successful in the presence of a congruent DRUJ.
An acute dorsal dislocation can be reduced with digital pressure on the distal ulna combined with forceful supination. A full-arm cast should be maintained for 6 weeks. Conclusive evidence for the preferred wrist position is lacking [51, 52]. An acute volar dislocation should be reduced with digital pressure on the volar side in forceful pronation. Indications for operative treatment are interposition of soft tissue preventing manual reduction, a locked DRUJ or persisting DRUJ instability due to a fracture of the volar lip of the sigmoid notch . Open reduction techniques are described by Gibson and Cox [54,55]. Lesions in the IM, as seen in Essex-Lopresti injury, need stabilization of both the radial head and the DRUJ.
Chronic DRUJ instability can be treated by functional bracing if patients are unwilling or unfit for surgery .
For operative treatment of chronic DRUJ instability, both anatomical and non-anatomical techniques can be used. The first step in anatomic reconstruction consists of analysis of osseous alignment. Malalignment needs to be corrected if present. However, the need for re-insertion of a fractured or non-united ulnar styloid base is still a matter of debate. The second step is reconstruction of the intrinsic and extrinsic stabilizing structures, which can be done with open or arthroscopic procedures. When it is not possible to reconstruct the stabilizers, non-anatomic stabilization, using the surrounding tendons, may be indicated [57,58]. In general, results of non-anatomic treatment options, such as tenodesis using the flexor carpi ulnaris or the ECU tendon, are disappointing [59-61]. If non-anatomic DRUJ reconstructions give rise to complaints, several salvage procedures or ulnar head replacement have been suggested [62-67].
DRUJ instability is a common but frequently missed diagnosis. It is mostly associated with distal radius fractures. A malpositioned or lax distal ulna during physical examination, must give rise to suspicion of DRUJ instability. The presence of direct or indirect signs on conventional roentgenography may indicate DRUJ instability as well. Currently, CT scans are favored for further osseous radiologic evaluation, as is MR for ligamentous evaluation. If DRUJ instability is present, only one classification can be referred to. In acute situations, non-operative treatment can be successful after anatomical reduction. In operative treatment, the first step is restoration of anatomy by correction of osseous malalignment, followed by soft tissue repair. If not successful, non-anatomical stability should be provided, otherwise salvage procedures should be carried out.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
CONFLICT OF INTEREST