RESEARCH ARTICLE


Comparative Study of Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Unconstrained Bicondylar Total Knee Endoprostheses with Anti-allergic Coating



Philipp Bergschmidt*, 1, Rainer Bader1, Susanne Finze1, Christoph Schulze1, 2, Guenther Kundt3, Wolfram Mittelmeier1
1 Department of Orthopaedics, University of Rostock, Doberaner Strasse 142, D-18057 Rostock, Germany
2 Air Force Medical Squadron, Gnoiener Chaussee, 18334 Bad Suelze, Germany
3 Institute for Biostatistics and Informatics in Medicine and Ageing Research, University of Rostock, Ernst-Heydemann-Str. 8, D-18057 Rostock, Germany


Article Metrics

CrossRef Citations:
15
Total Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 464
Abstract HTML Views: 242
PDF Downloads: 123
Total Views/Downloads: 829
Unique Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 231
Abstract HTML Views: 147
PDF Downloads: 95
Total Views/Downloads: 473



Creative Commons License
© Bergschmidt et al.; Licensee Bentham Open..

open-access license: This is an open access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.

* Address correspondence to this author at the Department of Orthopaedics, University of Rostock, Doberaner Strasse 142, D-18057 Rostock, Germany; Tel: +49-381-494-9355; Fax: +49-381-494-9303; E-mail: philipp.bergschmidt@med.uni-rostock.de


Abstract

Background:

Hypersensitivity reactions to implant materials have become more important in total knee replacement (TKR). The purpose of this retrospective comparative study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of unconstrained bicondylar total knee prostheses with and without anti-allergic titanium(niobium)nitrite (Ti(Nb)N) coating.

Methods:

Twenty-four patients (25 TKRs) underwent a preoperative clinical evaluation and then a postoperative evaluation after 26.2 months in the allergy group treated with coated implants (n=13 implants) and after 24.5 months in the control group treated with uncoated implants but identical geometry (n=12) using HSS, WOMAC and SF-36 scores. Radiological evaluations were performed using standard anterior-posterior (a.p.) and lateral X-rays.

Results:

During follow-up two patients of the allergy group had to undergo revision surgery due to non-implant-related reasons. A comparative analysis of both study groups showed a significant difference in the HSS scores at both evaluation time points (MW test p≤0.050); these findings are remarkable since the control group had a significantly lower score preoperatively (54.0 vs 65.0 points) and a significantly higher score (82.5 vs 75.0 points) postoperatively. The preoperative and postoperative WOMAC and SF-36 scores were comparable in both groups (MW test p≥0.052), although the postoperative increase in the score for the allergy group was lower. The radiological results were comparable in both groups and were unlikely to influence the results.

Conclusions:

This clinical study demonstrates the restricted outcome in postoperative function and quality of life in the allergy group compared to the control group.

Keywords: Allergy, bicondylar surface replacement, functional outcome, implant materials, radiological outcome, total knee replacement.