Surgical Site Infections Following Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Ankle Fractures



T Thangarajah*, P.S.V Prasad, B Narayan
Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Prescot Street, Liverpool, L7 8XP, UK


Article Metrics

CrossRef Citations:
0
Total Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 654
Abstract HTML Views: 563
PDF Downloads: 158
Total Views/Downloads: 1375
Unique Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 404
Abstract HTML Views: 346
PDF Downloads: 126
Total Views/Downloads: 876



© Thangarajah et al.; Licensee Bentham Open.

open-access license: This is an open access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.

* Address correspondence to this author at the Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Link 4C, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Prescot Street, Liverpool, L7 8XP, UK; Tel: 0151 706 2000; E-mail: tanujan1@hotmail.com


Abstract

Background:

Ankle fracture fixation is one of the most commonly performed orthopaedic procedures. Although the results are generally favourable, complications are not uncommon, particularly in the case of surgical site infections. These have considerable impact on both postoperative morbidity and healthcare costs. Paradoxically, there is a paucity of literature studying patients who sustain them and therefore little is known about ways such occurrences can be minimised. The purpose of this study was to determine the infection rate following ankle fracture fixation and elucidate variables in their causation.

Methods:

We retrospectively reviewed 50 consecutive patients who underwent open reduction and internal fixation of an ankle fracture. The study group consisted of 26 females and 24 males with an average age of 43 (Range 16-82) years.

Results:

Problems with superficial infections were noted in seven patients and deep infections in five. Of the latter, four patients underwent further surgery including two that had their metal work removed. With use of the Fisher’s exact test we determined that only smoking and a bimalleolar fracture pattern were significant variables, having p-values of 0.02 and 0.04 respectively.

Conclusion:

We recommend that patients with ankle fractures who either have a history of smoking and/or bimalleolar injury be counselled about the potential risk of infection and its implications on their functional recovery. The ability to identify patients at risk of such problems highlights the need for caution during the perioperative period so that care strategies may be altered to facilitate recovery.

Keywords: Ankle fracture, open reduction internal fixation, infection, complication.