Lumbar Solitary Osteochondroma with Lower Extremity Weakness: A Case Report

Takahiro Sato1, *, Hayato Kinoshita2, Takashi Kobayashi2, Naohisa Miyakoshi1
1 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1-1 Hondo, Akita010-8543, Japan
2 Akita Kosei Medical Center, 1-1-1 Nishibukuro Iijima, Akita011-0948, Japan

Article Metrics

CrossRef Citations:
Total Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 672
Abstract HTML Views: 412
PDF Downloads: 374
ePub Downloads: 157
Total Views/Downloads: 1615
Unique Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 402
Abstract HTML Views: 233
PDF Downloads: 217
ePub Downloads: 122
Total Views/Downloads: 974

Creative Commons License
© 2022 Sato et al.

open-access license: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0), a copy of which is available at: This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

* Address correspondence to this author at the Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1-1 Hondo, Akita 010-8543, Japan; Tel: +81 18-834-1111; E-mail:



Osteochondroma is the most common benign bone tumor. However, osteochondroma of the spine is relatively rare, accounting for only 4% to 7% of primary benign spinal tumors and less than 3% of all osteochondromas. Furthermore, symptomatic osteochondroma in the lumbar spine is much rarer. We herein describe a patient who was diagnosed with a lumbar solitary osteochondroma causing neurological symptoms of the lower extremities. The patient successfully underwent surgical removal of the lesion.

Case Presentation:

A 79-year-old man presented with a 3-year history of difficulty walking and gradual development of numbness in his left upper extremity, which further exacerbated his difficulty walking. Magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography revealed spinal stenosis at C3/4, L4/5, and L5/S1 and an osseous solitary lesion. We performed a single-stage operation of both the cervical and lumbar spine. The osseous solitary lesion at L5/S1 was removed, and the pathological diagnosis was osteochondroma. After the operation, the patient’s upper extremity numbness and walking ability were improved.


We experienced a rare case of a neurologically symptomatic solitary osteochondroma in the lumbar spinal canal. Moreover, this lesion was found at the same time as cervical spondylosis causing numbness. Therefore, we must perform careful examinations and thoroughly evaluate imaging and postoperative pathological findings.

Keywords: Lumbar spine, Osteochondroma, Lower extremity weakness, Examinations, Pathological, Numbness.


Osteochondroma is the most common benign bone tumor, constituting 20% to 50% of all benign bone tumors and 10% to 15% of all bone tumors [1, 2]. Osteochondroma is most often found in long bones; reports suggest that osteochondroma of the spine is relatively rare, accounting for only 4% to 7% of primary benign spinal tumors and less than 3% of all osteochondromas [1, 3-5].

Several reports have shown that spinal osteochondroma is generally associated with multiple hereditary exostoses and that solitary osteochondroma (SOC) is rare [3, 5, 6]. Furthermore, symptomatic osteochondroma in the lumbar spine is much rarer [7].

In this article, we present a case involving the surgical treatment of SOC of the lumbar spine with neurological symptoms affecting the lower extremities.


A 79-year-old man presented with a 3-year history of difficulty walking. He had developed gradually worsening numbness in his left upper extremity, which further exacerbated his difficulty walking. He visited the nearest general hospital and was referred to our department for further treatment.

Hoffmann’s reflex in both upper extremities was accelerated, and he was unable to perform delicate movements such as buttoning and writing. He had no muscle weakness or sensory disturbance in his upper extremities. However, sensory disturbance was present in both lower extremities with muscle weakness of the iliopsoas (manual muscle testing [MMT]: fair/normal), tibialis anterior (MMT: poor/poor), extensor hallucis longus (MMT: fair/fair), and gastrocnemius (MMT: fair/fair). His bilateral patella tendon reflex was accelerated because of a cervical lesion. His bilateral Achilles tendon reflex was reduced. No bladder or bowel disturbance was found.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed spinal stenosis at C3/4, L4/5, and L5/S1 (Figs. 1 and 2). The right lesion at the level of L5/S1 appeared as a hyperintense area on both T1- and T2-weighted imaging in the thickened ligament flava. Computed tomography (CT) showed a high-density solitary lesion at this site, and we suspected an osseous tumorous lesion (Fig. 2).

Fig. (1). Magnetic resonance imaging of the cervical spine (sagittal and axial views). T2-weighted imaging shows severe stenosis of C3/4.

Fig. (2). Magnetic resonance imaging (sagittal and axial views) and computed tomography (axial view) of the lumbar spine. T2WI and T1WI show L4/5 and L5/S1 stenosis and a solitary lesion that is hyperintense on both T1WI and T2WI in the thickened ligament flava. Computed tomography reveals an osseous solitary lesion in the canal. T2WI, T2-weighted imaging; T1WI, T1-weighted imaging.

We performed laminectomy of L5 and S1 with removal of the solitary lesion. In the cervical spine, we conducted laminectomy of C3 and laminoplasty of C4 (Fig. 3).

Fig. (3). Postoperative radiographs. In the cervical spine, C3 laminectomy and C4 laminoplasty were performed. In the lumbar spine, L5 and S1 laminectomy with removal of the osteochondroma was performed.

Histological analysis revealed that the lesion was mature cancellous bone and covered with a thin cartilage cap. The final pathological diagnosis was osteochondroma (Fig. 4).

Fig. (4). (A) Macroscopic appearance of the solitary lesion. (B) A specimen stained with hematoxylin–eosin shows mature cancellous bone covered with a thin cartilage cap and no malignant findings.

The postoperative course was uneventful. The patient’s upper extremity numbness was improved, and he was able to walk again.


SOC most commonly affects the cervical spine and usually arises from the posterior arch of the vertebra. The lumbar spine is the third most common site of SOC after the cervical and thoracic spine [3]. In a review including 132 cases by Yakkanti et al. [8], the most commonly involved spinal levels were in the cervical region (65 cases, 52%), followed by the lumbar (35 cases, 27%), thoracic (24 cases, 18%), sacral (9 cases, 7%), and coccygeal (1 case, 1%) regions. The most frequently involved spinal anatomic column was the posterior column (85 cases, 64%), followed by the unknown (28 cases, 21%) and the anterior column (19 cases, 14%); [8]. In addition, neurological symptoms caused by spinal osteochondroma are atypical because most of these lesions grow out of the spinal canal [7]. Kahveci et al. [9] reported a unique case of lumbar SOC presenting with footdrop. In another report, they summarized 21 cases of lumbar SOC associated with symptoms including low back pain, numbness, and weakness, and only 4 of these 21 patients were aged >60 years [10].

Yagi et al. [11] and Sakai et al. [12] reported several cases of growth of SOC even though skeletal maturation had long since been completed, degenerative changes in the spine led to spinal cord compression in elderly patients. In our case, the patient was 79 years old, and MRI showed degenerative changes. As a result, both the L5 and S1 nerve roots were compressed within the spinal canal and at the lateral recess, which was one of the factors that caused the neurological symptoms in this elderly patient with SOC.

CT and MRI are effective for the diagnosis of SOC. CT can show the diagnostic appearance of the marrow and cortical continuity with the underlying vertebra. MRI shows a hypointense peripheral lesion corresponding to the cortical bone and a hyperintense central lesion corresponding to the cancellous bone, making the lesion clear [13]. Therefore, the use of preoperative imaging is important because it may reveal special diseases associated with bone lesions.

Many surgeons agree that surgical treatment of symptomatic osteochondroma is the best method for recovery of neurological function and avoidance of future complications. In one study, surgical treatment reportedly improved the neurological deficit in nearly 90% of patients whose spinal cord was compromised by SOC [9].

Dahlin and Unni [1] reported that the risk of local recurrence of surgically treated SOC of the limbs was 2%, with a highly variable disease-free interval ranging from 1 to 26 years. The risk of recurrence is greater in children [1]. Gille et al. [14] reported that the risk of recurrence of SOC in the spine was 4%, and the mean period until recurrence was 5 years (range, 6 months to 14 years). They also reported that incomplete removal of the cartilaginous cap may lead to tumor recurrence [14]. For this reason, we should not hesitate to completely resect the lesion, even if this compromises the stability of the vertebral column, necessitating osteosynthesis [14]. SOC is associated with a risk of malignant transformation. The estimated frequency of degeneration is about 1%, and its histological type is chondrosarcoma [1]. However, osteochondroma of the spine may have a higher risk of malignant transformation than peripheral osteochondroma. According to Sciubba et al. [15]. Malignant transformation occurred in 3 of 27 patients who were diagnosed with osteochondroma of the spine and received surgical treatment in a multicenter study. The incidence was 11%, higher than that of peripheral lesions [15]. Other risk factors for malignant transformation are the presence of a >3-cm-thick cartilaginous cap, new onset of symptoms, and a rapid increase in the size of the tumor [15, 16].

In our patient, the cartilaginous cap was thin (<3 cm) and the growth was not rapid. However, SOC has a risk of malignant transformation, as mentioned above. Therefore, clinicians must pay attention not only to neurological symptoms but also to recurrence and malignant transformation in patients with SOC.


In conclusion, we experienced a rare case of a neurologically symptomatic SOC in the lumbar spinal canal. Moreover, the SOC was found at the same time as cervical spondylosis causing numbness. Therefore, we must perform careful examinations and thoroughly evaluate imaging and postoperative pathological findings.


SOC = Solitary Osteochondroma
MMT = Manual Muscle Testing
MRI = Magnetic Resonance Imaging
CT = Computed Tomography


TK performed the surgery. TS and HK prepared the manuscript. NM assisted in drafting and reviewing the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.


Not applicable.


No animals/humans were used for studies that are the basis of this research.


Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.


Care guidelines were followed.


The data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article.




The authors declare no conflict of interest, financial or otherwise.


We thank Angela Morben, DVM ELS, from Edanz ( for editing a draft of this manuscript.


[1] Dahlin DC, Unni KK. Bone tumors: general aspects and data on 8,547 cases 4th ed. 1986.
[2] Murphey MD, Choi JJ, Kransdorf MJ, Flemming DJ, Gannon FH. Imaging of osteochondroma: variants and complications with radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics 2000; 20(5): 1407-34.
[3] Albrecht S, Crutchfield JS, SeGall GK. On spinal osteochondromas. J Neurosurg 1992; 77(2): 247-52.
[4] OʼBrien MF, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Schoenecker PL. Intracanalicular osteochondroma producing spinal cord compression in hereditary multiple exostoses. J Spinal Disord 1994; 7(3): 236-41.
[5] Roblot P, Alcalay M, Cazenave-Roblot F, Levy P, Bontoux D. Osteochondroma of the thoracic spine. Report of a case and review of the literature. Spine 1990; 15(3): 240-3.
[6] Khosla A, Martin DS, Awwad EE. The solitary intraspinal vertebral osteochondroma. An unusual cause of compressive myelopathy: features and literature review. Spine 1999; 24(1): 77-81.
[7] Bess RS, Robbin MR, Bohlman HH, Thompson GH. Spinal Exostoses. Spine 2005; 30(7): 774-80.
[8] Yakkanti R, Onyekwelu I, Carreon LY, Dimar JR II. Solitary osteochondroma of the spine-a case series: review of solitary osteochondroma with myelopathic symptoms. Global Spine J 2018; 8(4): 323-39.
[9] Kahveci R, Ergüngör MF, Günaydın A, Sanli AM, Temiz A. Solitary lumbar osteochondroma presenting with foot-drop: a case report. Turk Neurosurg 2012; 22(3): 386-8.
[10] Kahveci R, Ergüngör MF, Günaydın A, Temiz A. Lumbar solitary osteochondroma presenting with cauda equina syndrome: a case report. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2012; 46(6): 468-72.
[11] Yagi M, Ninomiya K, Kihara M, Horiuchi Y. Symptomatic osteochondroma of the spine in elderly patients. J Neurosurg Spine 2009; 11(1): 64-70.
[12] Sakai D, Mochida J, Toh E, Nomura T. Spinal osteochondromas in middle-aged to elderly patients. Spine 2002; 27(23): E503-6.
[13] Rodallec MH, Feydy A, Larousserie F, et al. Diagnostic imaging of solitary tumors of the spine: what to do and say. Radiographics 2008; 28(4): 1019-41.
[14] Gille O, Pointillart V, Vital JM. Course of spinal solitary osteochondromas. Spine 2005; 30(1): E13-9.
[15] Sciubba DM, Macki M, Bydon M, et al. Long-term outcomes in primary spinal osteochondroma: a multicenter study of 27 patients. J Neurosurg Spine 2015; 22(6): 582-8.
[16] Srikantha U, Bhagavatula ID, Satyanarayana S, Somanna S, Chandramouli BA. Spinal osteochondroma: Spectrum of a rare disease. J Neurosurg Spine 2008; 8(6): 561-6.