Malignant Transformation of Synovial Chondromatosis: A Systematic Review

All published articles of this journal are available on ScienceDirect.

REVIEW ARTICLE

Malignant Transformation of Synovial Chondromatosis: A Systematic Review

The Open Orthopaedics Journal 31 May 2017 REVIEW ARTICLE DOI: 10.2174/1874325001711010517

Abstract

Background:

Synovial chondromatosis (SCh) can undergo malignant transformation. Pathologic diagnosis of secondary synovial chondrosarcoma (SChS) is challenging and misdiagnosis may result in over- or undertreatment.

Method:

A systematic review revealed 48 cases of SChS published in 27 reports since 1957. Data was collected to identify findings indicative of SChS and outcomes of treatment.

Results:

At median follow-up of 18 months, patients were reported as alive (10%), alive without disease (22%), alive with disease (15%), dead of disease (19%), dead of pulmonary embolism (4%), and unknown (29%). Initial diagnosis of SChS (grade: low/unknown 48%, intermediate/high 52%) was after biopsy in 58%, local resection in 29%, and amputation in 13%. Seventy-four percent of patients underwent 1.8 (mean) resections. Patients treated prior to 1992 were managed with amputation in 79% of cases compared to 48% after 1992. Symptoms were present for 72 mos prior to diagnosis of SChS.

Synovial chondrosarcoma demonstrated symptom progression over several months (82%), rapid recurrence after complete resection (30%), and medullary canal invasion (43%). The SChS tumor dimensions were seldom quantified.

Conclusion:

Malignant degeneration of synovial chondromatosis is rare but can necessitate morbid surgery or result in death. Pathognomonic signs for SChS including intramedullary infiltration are present in the minority of cases. Progression of symptoms, quick local recurrence, and muscle infiltration are more suggestive of SChS. Periarticular cortical erosion, extra-capsular extension, and metaplastic chondroid features are non-specific. Although poorly documented for SChS, tumor size is a strong indicator of malignancy.

Biopsy and partial resection are prone to diagnostic error. Surgical decisions are frequently based on size and clinical appearance and may be in conflict with pathologic diagnosis.

Keywords: Synovial chondromatosis, Chondrosarcoma, Malignant transformation, Osteochondromatosis, Size.

INTRODUCTION

Synovial chondromatosis (SCh) is a metaplastic chondroid proliferation within articular joints and, less commonly, in bursa or tendon sheath [1-3]. The vast majority of cases are symptomatic yet benign [4]. While amenable to local resection, SCh is prone to recurrence (~15-25%), particularly if incompletely excised [4-7] Malignant transformation of SCh into secondary synovial chondrosarcoma (SChS) has been reported in 1-10% of patients [4, 8-10]. Because SCh often exhibits aggressive clinical, radiographic and histologic features, distinguishing SCh from SChS can be challenging [11, 12].

It is well recognized that most cartilaginous conditions such as SCh and multiple enchondromatosis represent low-grade or benign cartilage tumors on histologic analysis. Patients with SChS are often underdiagnosed and undergo multiple resections before SChS is considered as a diagnosis and adequate treatment is performed. The histologic challenges of diagnosing chondrosarcoma are well-recognized for low grade cartilage tumors [13].

Malignant transformation of SCh has previously been reported in the literature through numerous case reports and series. The purpose of this systematic review was to 1) identify clinical, radiographic and histopathologic findings indicative of SChS in the setting of SCh, 2) determine the outcomes of SChS, and 3) formulate a treatment approach for SChS.

Table 1.
Description of studies included in systematic review.
Authors Year Published No. of Cases Surgical Treatment for SChS Outcomes
Brannon et al. 1957 1 Amp Dead
Nixon et al. 1960 1 Amp Unknown
Goldman et al. 1964 3 Amp (2), none (1) Unknown (2), Alive unspecified (1)
Mullins et al. 1965 1 Amp Alive w/ disease
King et al. 1967 1 Amp Alive w/out disease
Dunn et al. 1974 1 Amp Alive w/ disease
Milgram et al. 1976 1 None Dead
Kaiser et al. 1980 1 Amp Unknown
Hamilton et al. 1987 1 Amp Alive unspecified
Garz et al. 1988 1 Resection / Megaprosthesis Alive w/ disease
Perry et al. 1988 1 Amp Dead
Benoit et al. 1990 1 Amp Unknown
Bertoni et al. 1991 5 Amp (4), Synovectomy (1) Alive w/out disease (4), Dead (1)
Kenan et al. 1993 1 Synovectomy Alive with disease
Ontell et al. 1994 1 Amp Alive without disease
Anract et al. 1996 6 Amp (4), Resection / Megaprosthesis (2) Unknown (5), Alive without disease (1)
Hermann et al. 1997 1 None Dead
Taconis et al. 1997 1 None Dead
Wuisman et al. 1997 2 En-bloc resection (2) Alive without disease (2)
Davis et al. 1998 2 Amp (1), None (1) Dead (2)
Hallam et al. 2001 1 TKA Alive without disease
Wittkop et al. 2002 2 Unk (2) Unknown (2)
Sperling et al. 2003 2 Amp (1), None (1) Alive with disease (2)
Bhadra et al. 2007 1 Amp Alive unspecified
Sah et al. 2007 1 Amp Unknown
Campanacci et al. 2008 2 Amputation (1), Palliative Radiation (1) Alive without disease (1), Alive with disease (1)
Yao et al. 2012 1 TKA Unknown
Evans et al. 2013 5 Amp (3), Debulking (2) Alive unspecified (2), Dead (3)
Legend – Amp (amputation); DOD (dead of disease); Unk (unknown/not reported); AWD (alive with disease); NED (alive; no evidence of disease); TKA (total knee arthroplasty).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A literature search on malignant transformation of SCh was performed for all studies indexed on PubMed and for cited references in aforementioned studies up to June 1st, 2014 (Table 1). The search strategy consisted of terms synovial, chondromatosis, osteochondromatosis, malignant, chondrosarcoma combined with the Boolean operator AND Fig. (1). Case series of benign SCh were excluded. All cases of malignant transformation of SCh were included. Three non-English language articles were translated and reviewed as well. Forty-eight patients in 28 level IV evidence articles, as defined by Sackett [13], from 1957 to 2013 were identified [2, 4, 5, 7-9, 11, 12, 14-32] . No higher level of data were identified and the majority of reports consisted of less than 3 cases. Collected data included gender, age at diagnosis of SCh and SChS, size, osseous involvement on imaging (cortical vs. intramedullary), primary site of disease, presenting clinical symptoms, prior treatment for SCh, episodes of local recurrence, pathologic/histologic grade, clinical signs of transformation, method of SChS diagnosis, size of SChS lesion, treatment for SChS, metastatic spread, disease status and length of follow-up. Increasing pain over 6-12 weeks was interpreted as clinical progression. Early recurrence of SCh was defined as recurrence less than 12 months after resection.

Fig. (1). Search Flow Diagram.
Table 2.
Spectrum of local invasiveness and metastatic potential for cartilaginous neoplasms.
Chondroma / Enchondroma Increasing Invasiveness
Multiple Enchondromatosis Metastatic Potential
Synovial Chondromatosis
Chondroblastoma
Low Grade Chondrosarcoma
Intermediate Grade Chondrosarcoma
High Grade Chodrosarcoma
Dedifferentiated Chondrosarcoma

An Excel worksheet (Microsoft, Redmond, WA) was created to compile and juxtapose all relevant data for comparison. The Fisher’s exact test was used to compare rates of amputation. Characteristics specific for neither SCh nor SChS were also noted (Table 1).

RESULTS

The mean age at diagnoses of SChS was 53 years. There were 52% males, 33% females, and 15% gender not reported. The sites of disease were knee (50%), hip (33%),, ankle (6%), shoulder (4%), and other/unknown (6%). At latest follow-up (median 18 mos; range, 3 to 136), outcomes were reported as alive (10%), alive without disease (22%), alive with disease (15%), dead of disease (19%), dead of pulmonary embolism (4%), and unknown (29%). Further specification regarding death from disease or pulmonary embolism was not available. The rate of local recurrence for SCh that underwent malignant transformation was very high. Seventy-four percent of patients underwent multiple resections with a mean of 1.8 resections (range, 1 to 3) and 61% eventually required amputation. Prior to 1992, the incidence of amputation was 79% (15 of 19) and after 1992, it was 48% (13 of 27) (p = 0.0017). Symptoms of pain and swelling were present for a mean of 72 months (3 to 462) prior to diagnosis of SChS. Initial diagnosis of SChS (grade: low 25%, intermediate 40%, high 12%, unknown 23%) was after biopsy in 58%, local resection in 29%, and amputation in 13%.

The following attributes were documented by the reporting authors in the following proportion of cases for SChS: rapid progression of pain (82%), invasion of medullary bone on imaging or histology (43%), rapid recurrence (<12 mos) after complete resection of SCh (30%), or infiltration of adjacent muscle (12%).

A soft tissue mass, joint effusion, joint space destruction, osseous erosion, local recurrence, and pathologic features of low-grade chondrosarcoma were universally reported as not specific for either SCh or SChS [4, 8, 18, 20, 23, 24, 26, 31]. The SChS dimensions were seldom quantified (range, 7-37 cm; 83% not reported), but the lesions were invariably larger than pre-existing SCh and had substantial involvement of surrounding tissues.

DISCUSSIONS

Differentiating SChS from benign SCh is a significant histologic and clinical challenge at presentation and following resection. Based on this systematic review of reported cases, objective diagnostic findings for SChS include medullary bone invasion on imaging or histology and pathologic findings consistent with grade II or III chondrosarcoma [30, 33, 34] (Fig. 2). Concerning features include rapid clinical progression of pain, local recurrence within 12 mos after resection, soft tissue infiltration of tumor, and large size [34] (Fig. 3). Similar to the diagnostic and grading challenges of other chondroid malignancies, accurate assessment of SChS requires consideration of clinical, radiographic and histologic findings [32].

Fig. (2). Synovial chondrosarcoma in the setting of synovial chondromatosis 47 year-old male with two prior ankle injuries and pain over the past 3 years now presenting with recent progression of pain and swelling. Initial biopsy was consistent with grade II/III chondrosarcoma, confirming the radiographic appearance (MRI, A; Plain XR, B) and clinical presentation. He underwent below-knee amputation.

Distinguishing benign from malignant chondroid tumors is notoriously difficult on pathology alone [35]. A benign or even low-grade pathologic diagnosis should be highly suspicious in the setting of a massive tumor. Size is a strong indicator of aggressive and malignant behavior. The size of SChS was frequently implied, but documentation of dimensions was absent in most reports. Although not well-recognized for SChS, size and location are well-described for assessing the risk profiles for conventional chondrosarcoma [36, 37] and other musculoskeletal malignancies [38, 39].

Fig. (3). Synovial chondrosarcoma in the setting of synovial chondromatosis 43 year-old female presenting with a massive localized chondroid lesion suspected to have malignant degeneration of synovial chondromatosis based on imaging (MRI, A) and symptomatology. Histologic evidence of chondrosarcoma, however, was only detected after resection of essentially the entire lesion.

Benign cartilaginous conditions such as Ollier’s disease and SCh are recognized to have a more aggressive histologic appearance than intraosseous cartilage lesions or enchondromas [2, 26]. For SCh, findings such as periarticular bone or articular cartilage erosion, extra-capsular extension, and metaplastic chondroid features, even resembling low-grade chondrosarcoma, can be present. Because the relative invasiveness and metastatic potential of cartilage neoplasms lies along a continuum (Table 2), making surgical decisions about the extent of resection can be difficult.

Limitations of this study include the availability of only Level IV evidence and multiple studies where tumor size is not quantified and long-term patient survival is not documented. Because of the rarity of this condition, extrapolations need to be made from the existing literature that may not be supported by large cohort or controlled studies. The treatment for SChS has evolved to include more limb preservation options rather than amputation, but because sample size is relatively limited and the variability between characteristics of each case, it is difficult to draw broad conclusions or recommendations regarding limb preservation.

The standard initial treatment for symptomatic SCh is joint-preserving arthroscopic or open resection [9, 29]. Incomplete removal of SCh and partial synovectomy will likely result in local recurrence [28]. Repeated local recurrence may be associated with eventual malignant transformation [7]. Seventy-five percent of SChS cases had multiple prior excisions of locally recurrent SCh.

Depending on the extent of disease, total joint arthroplasty may be necessary. For patients with large tumors (>5-10 cm) and local invasion, open biopsy and incomplete resection are likely to result in a benign or low-grade cartilaginous neoplasm diagnosis [9, 10, 16, 17, 30]. For low-grade SChS, complete resection and close surveillance is probably adequate [33].

If there is local recurrence of a low-grade SChS or the presence of intermediate- or high-grade SChS on pathologic evaluation, wide resection is necessary and in many cases, amputation will be required to achieve adequate margins. Surgical decisions regarding large or recurrent tumors should be made on the basis of tumor size and imaging appearance, even with an apparent histologic diagnosis of “low-grade” chondrosarcoma.

CONSENT FOR PUBLICATION

Not applicable.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

None of the listed authors have conflicts of interest to disclose (VYN, PL, SEWP, DJD). EUC is a board member of LifeNet Health.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Declared none.

REFERENCES

1
Apte SS, Athanasou NA. An immunohistological study of cartilage and synovium in primary synovial chondromatosis. J Pathol 1992; 166(3): 277-81.
2
Hamilton A, Davis RI, Hayes D, Mollan RA. Chondrosarcoma developing in synovial chondromatosis. A case report. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1987; 69(1): 137-40.
3
Mussey RD Jr, Henderson MS. Osteochondromatosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1949; 31A(3): 619-27.
4
Davis RI, Hamilton A, Biggart JD. Primary synovial chondromatosis: A clinicopathologic review and assessment of malignant potential. Hum Pathol 1998; 29(7): 683-8.
5
Milgram JW, Addison RG. Synovial osteochondromatosis of the knee. Chondromatous recurrence with possible chondrosarcomatous degeneration. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1976; 58(2): 264-6.
6
Murphey MD, Vidal JA, Fanburg-Smith JC, Gajewski DA. Imaging of synovial chondromatosis with radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics 2007; 27(5): 1465-88.
7
Sah AP, Geller DS, Mankin HJ, et al. Malignant transformation of synovial chondromatosis of the shoulder to chondrosarcoma. A case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89(6): 1321-8.
8
Wittkop B, Davies AM, Mangham DC. Primary synovial chondromatosis and synovial chondrosarcoma: A pictorial review. Eur Radiol 2002; 12(8): 2112-9.
9
Evans S, Boffano M, Chaudhry S, Jeys L, Grimer R. Synovial chondrosarcoma arising in synovial chondromatosis 2014; 1-4. 647939
10
Bhadra AK, Pollock R, Tirabosco RP, et al. Primary tumours of the synovium. A report of four cases of malignant tumour. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007; 89(11): 1504-8.
11
Benoit J, Arnaud E, Moulucou A, Hardy P, Got C, Judet O. [Synovial osteochondromatosis of the knee and synovial chondrosarcoma. Report of 2 cases]. Rev Chir Orthop Repar Appar Mot 1990; 76(3): 198-203.
12
Bertoni F, Unni KK, Beabout JW, Sim FH. Chondrosarcomas of the synovium. Cancer 1991; 67(1): 155-62.
13
Sackett DL. Rules of evidence and clinical recommendations on the use of antithrombotic agents. Chest 1989; 95(2)(Suppl.): 2S-4S.
14
Brannon EW, Tracey JF. Hindquarter amputation for hip chondrosarcoma. U S Armed Forces Med J 1957; 8(10): 1517-26.
15
Nixon JE, Frank GR, Chambers G. Synovial osteochondromatosis with report of four cases, one showing malignant change. U S Armed Forces Med J 1960; 11: 1434-45.
16
Goldman RL, Lichtenstein L. Synovial Chondrosarcoma. Cancer 1964; 17: 1233-40.
17
Mullins F, Berard CW, Eisenberg SH. Chondrosarcoma Following Synovial Chondromatosis. A Case Study. Cancer 1965; 18: 1180-8.
18
King JW, Spjut HJ, Fechner RE, Vanderpool DW. Synovial chondrosarcoma of the knee joint. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1967; 49(7): 1389-96.
19
Dunn EJ, McGavran MH, Nelson P, Greer RB III. Synovial chondrosarcoma. Report of a case. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1974; 56(4): 811-3.
20
Kaiser TE, Ivins JC, Unni KK. Malignant transformation of extra-articular synovial chondromatosis: Report of a case. Skeletal Radiol 1980; 5(4): 223-6.
21
Garz G, Lüning M, Grossmann I. [Malignant degeneration of recurrent synovial chondromatosis in the hip joint]. Rofo 1988; 148(2): 208-10.
22
Perry BE, McQueen DA, Lin JJ. Synovial chondromatosis with malignant degeneration to chondrosarcoma. Report of a case. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1988; 70(8): 1259-61.
23
Kenan S, Abdelwahab IF, Klein MJ, Lewis MM. Case report 817: Synovial chondrosarcoma secondary to synovial chondromatosis. Skeletal Radiol 1993; 22(8): 623-6.
24
Ontell F, Greenspan A. Chondrosarcoma complicating synovial chondromatosis: Findings with magnetic resonance imaging. Can Assoc Radiol J 1994; 45(4): 318-23.
25
Anract P, Katabi M, Forest M, Benoit J, Witvoet J, Tomeno B. [Synovial chondromatosis and chondrosarcoma. A study of the relationship between these two diseases]. Rev Chir Orthop Repar Appar Mot 1996; 82(3): 216-24.
26
Hermann G, Klein MJ, Abdelwahab IF, Kenan S. Synovial chondrosarcoma arising in synovial chondromatosis of the right hip. Skeletal Radiol 1997; 26(6): 366-9.
27
Taconis WK, van der Heul RO, Taminiau AM. Synovial chondrosarcoma: Report of a case and review of the literature. Skeletal Radiol 1997; 26(11): 682-5.
28
Wuisman PI, Noorda RJ, Jutte PC. Chondrosarcoma secondary to synovial chondromatosis. Report of two cases and a review of the literature. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1997; 116(5): 307-11.
29
Hallam P, Ashwood N, Cobb J, Fazal A, Heatley W. Malignant transformation in synovial chondromatosis of the knee? Knee 2001; 8(3): 239-42.
30
Sperling BL, Angel S, Stoneham G, Chow V, McFadden A, Chibbar R. Synovial chondromatosis and chondrosarcoma: A diagnostic dilemma. Sarcoma 2003; 7(2): 69-73.
31
Campanacci DA, Matera D, Franchi A, Capanna R. Synovial chondrosarcoma of the hip: Report of two cases and literature review. Chir Organi Mov 2008; 92(3): 139-44.
32
Yao MS, Chang CM, Chen CL, Chan WP. Synovial chondrosarcoma arising from synovial chondromatosis of the knee. JBR-BTR 2012; 95(6): 360-2.
33
Manivel JC, Dehner LP, Thompson R. Case report 460: Synovial chondrosarcoma of left knee. Skeletal Radiol 1988; 17(1): 66-71.
34
Blokx WA, Rasing LA, Veth RP, Pruszczynski M. Late malignant transformation of biopsy proven benign synovial chondromatosis: An unexpected pitfall. Histopathology 2000; 36(6): 564-6.
35
Dorfman HD, Czerniak B. Bone tumors. Mosby 1998.
36
Fiorenza F, Abudu A, Grimer RJ, et al. Risk factors for survival and local control in chondrosarcoma of bone. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2002; 84(1): 93-9.
37
Lee FY, Mankin HJ, Fondren G, et al. Chondrosarcoma of bone: An assessment of outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1999; 81(3): 326-38.
38
Singer S, Baldini EH, Demetri GD, Fletcher JA, Corson JM. Synovial sarcoma: Prognostic significance of tumor size, margin of resection, and mitotic activity for survival. J Clin Oncol 1996; 14(4): 1201-8.
39
Pisters PW, Leung DH, Woodruff J, Shi W, Brennan MF. Analysis of prognostic factors in 1,041 patients with localized soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities. J Clin Oncol 1996; 14(5): 1679-89.