EDITORIAL


Editorial: Current Concepts in Arthroplasty §



Jasvinder A SinghRole: (Guest Editor)
Address: University of Alabama Faculty Office Tower 805B 510 20th Street S Birmingham AL 35294 USA Jasvinder.md@gmail.com



Article Metrics

CrossRef Citations:
0
Total Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 1226
Abstract HTML Views: 719
PDF Downloads: 221
Total Views/Downloads: 2166
Unique Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 714
Abstract HTML Views: 438
PDF Downloads: 119
Total Views/Downloads: 1271



© Jasvinder A. Singh; Licensee Bentham Open.

open-access license: This is an open access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.





This hot topic issue of the Open Orthopaedics Journal deals with current concepts and topics in arthroplasty. With contributions from the orthopedic surgeons, researchers and epidemiologists, it features a few interesting articles. The articles focus on current concepts providing a comprehensive review of some topics or addressing some controversial areas in the field of arthroplasty. Arthroplasty is one of the commonest surgeries performed for the relief of refractory pain due to severe arthritis of various etiologies and improvement in functional ability and health-related quality of life of patients [1-3]. Although a variety of demographic and clinical factors impact the outcome of hip and knee arthroplasty [1, 4-9], in general the results are excellent.

One of the articles reviews the epidemiology of knee and hip arthroplasty [Singh et al.]. In this systematic literature review, epidemiologic studies discussing the utilization rates of knee and hip arthroplasty and effect of important patient factors including age, gender and race/ethnicity are reviewed. With an aging population in the U.S. and other Western countries, the utilization rates of knee and hip arthroplasty are increasing. This can lead to a demand versus supply problem if the number of trained reconstructive orthopedic surgeons available fails to increase dramatically in the next few decades. The second article by Kalore et al. addresses a clinically, important and somewhat controversial area of diagnosis and management of infected Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA). Infection is one of the most common underlying reasons for early TKA failure and has become the number one reason for revision TKA in the U.S [10]. A variety of new diagnostic methods including molecular studies, new diagnostic radiographic tools available in addition to the traditional evaluation with synovial fluid analysis, bone scan and acute phase reactants such as C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate. This article reviews the evidence supporting various diagnostic modalities and treatment approaches. Certainly more research in the coming years will help us with even a more systematic approach to diagnosis and treatment of infected arthroplasty.

In the systematic review of biomarkers related to arthroplasty by Mertens et al., evidence is reviewed regarding the potential application of biomarkers to predict important outcomes after including osteolysis, aseptic loosening and infected arthroplasty. Thirty relevant studies were reviewed, with most relating to osteolysis or loosening. The study summarizes the current state-of-the-art in this field, which is clearly evolving. In another article by Dr. Sanchez-Sotelo, current state-of-the-art in shoulder arthroplasty is reviewed. The specific aspects of techniques, fixation and design, results, indications, outcomes and complications are discussed. Total shoulder arthroplasty, reverse shoulder arthroplasty and revision shoulder arthroplasty are discussed in detail with particular attention to underlying diagnoses and outcomes. Dr. Sanchez-Sotelo reviews state-of-the-art in total elbow arthroplasty in an accompanying article. This article provides a comprehensive overview of indications, outcomes, complications and issues related to technique and implant types. The two upper extremity reviews provide an up-to-date comprehensive review for practicing surgeons, residents and trainees.

It has been a privilege for me to serve as guest editor for this hot topic issue. I have enjoyed working with my esteemed colleagues in putting together this issue and have learned a lot from them in the process. With gratitude to them for their valuable contributions, I hope that this hot issue will add knowledge to the area of arthroplasty and help practicing surgeons as well as researchers.

GRANT SUPPORT

This material is supported by the resources and the use of facilities at the Birmingham VA Medical Center, Alabama, USA.

FINANCIAL CONFLICT

There are no financial conflicts related to this work. No financial support was received for writing this editorial. J.A.S. has received speaker honoraria from Abbott; research and travel grants from Allergan, Takeda, Savient, Wyeth and Amgen; and consultant fees from Savient, URL pharmaceuticals and Novartis.

NOTES

§ The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position or policy of the Department of Veterans Affairs or the United States government.

REFERENCES

[1] Ethgen O, Bruyere O, Richy F, Dardennes C, Reginster JY. Health-related quality of life in total hip and total knee arthroplasty. A qualitative and systematic review of the literature J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004; 86-A(5 ): 963-74.
[2] Kuhn JE, Blasier RB. Measuring outcomes in shoulder arthroplasty Semin Arthroplasty 1995; 6(4 ): 245-64.
[3] Learmonth ID, Young C, Rorabeck C. The operation of the century: total hip replacement Lancet 2007; 370(9597 ): 1508-9.
[4] Hawker G, Wright J, Coyte P, et al. Health-related quality of life after knee replacement J Bone Joint Surg Am 1998; 80(2 ): 163-73.
[5] Davis AM, Agnidis Z, Badley E, Kiss A, Waddell JP, Gross AE. Predictors of functional outcome two years following revision hip arthroplasty J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006; 88(4 ): 685-91.
[6] Singh JA, Lewallen D. Predictors of pain and use of pain medications following primary Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA): 5,707 THAs at 2-years and 3,289 THAs at 5-years BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2010; 11: 90.
[7] Singh JA, O'Byrne M, Harmsen S, Lewallen D. Predictors of moderate-severe functional limitation after primary Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA): 4701 TKAs at 2-years and 2935 TKAs at 5-years Osteoarthritis Cartil 2010; 18(4 ): 515-21.
[8] Singh JA, O'Byrne MM, Harmsen WS, Lewallen DG. Predictors of moderate-severe functional limitation 2 and 5 years after revision total knee arthroplasty J Arthroplasty 2010; 25(7 ): 1091-5.
[9] Singh JA, Lewallen D. Age, gender, obesity, and depression are associated with patient-related pain and function outcome after revision total hip arthroplasty Clin Rheumatol 2009; 28(12 ): 1419-30.
[10] Bozic KJ, Kurtz SM, Lau E, et al. The epidemiology of revision total knee arthroplasty in the United States Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010; 468(1): 45-51.