RESEARCH ARTICLE


Particulate Bone Allograft Incorporation in Regeneration of Osseous Defects; Importance of Particle Sizes



Theodore I Malinin*, 1, 2, Ellen M Carpenter3, H. Thomas Temple1
1 Tissue Bank, Department of Orthopaedics, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine Miami, Florida, USA
2 Mannheimer Foundation, Homestead, Florida, USA
3 Department of Psychiatry, University of California Los Angeles, School of Medicine, Los Angeles California, USA


Article Metrics

CrossRef Citations:
29
Total Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 346
Abstract HTML Views: 293
PDF Downloads: 119
Total Views/Downloads: 758
Unique Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 199
Abstract HTML Views: 162
PDF Downloads: 90
Total Views/Downloads: 451



Creative Commons License
2007 Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.

open-access license: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/), which permits unrestrictive use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

* Address correspondence to this author at the Tissue Bank, Department of Orthopaedics, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine Miami, Florida 33101, USA; E-mail: TMalinin@med.miami.edu


Abstract

Packing of bone defect with particulate allografts is a commonly performed clinical procedure. However, the ideal size of bone particles used to fill bone defects is ill-defined. For this reason the study of biology of bone allografts with different particle sizes has been performed. Standard size bone defects in the femur and the tibia of experimental animals were filled with freeze-dried cortical bone allografts with particle sizes of 1-2mm, 800-500μm, 500-300μm, 300-90μm, 250-125μm, 125-106μm, 106 to 75μm and 75-25μm. Unfilled defects and those filled with autologous bone served as controls. Cortical bone was chosen because it produced better clinical results than did cancellous bone. Likewise freeze-dried particulate bone effected more rapid healing than did frozen bone. Numerical scores were assigned to each defect based on the gross, radiographic and histomorphometric studies. Particles in the range of 300 to 90 microns produced rapid healing by direct ossification. Particles below 100µm had a significantly reduced osteogenic potential. Particles in the range of 75-25μm failed to heal the defects all together. Healing of defects packed with particles larger than 300μm was slower than with 300 – 90 μm grafts. Rapid healing of bone defects packed with particulate bone allografts in the range of 300 to 90μm indicates such allografts can be used effectively in the filling of bone defects. This is of clinical relevance.